header-logo header-logo

Antarctica: no man’s land… for now?

08 October 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
60027
Mark Pawlowski considers some of the problems associated with territorial claims to Antarctica

Below 60 degrees latitude lies the immense continent of Antarctica. It covers almost one-tenth of the Earth’s surface and supports the greatest mass of ice in the world. Its isolation, the stormy nature of the intervening seas and, above all, Antarctica’s extreme climate, explain why it has been difficult to reach and explore until relatively modern times. It has also posed a challenge to traditional international law because its unique features make it impossible to apply the usual methods for establishing (and perfecting) claims of territorial sovereignty.

Antarctica currently has no permanent population and, therefore, it has no citizenship nor government. Personnel present in Antarctica at any time are almost always citizens or nationals of some sovereignty outside Antarctica, as there is no Antarctic sovereignty.

Sovereignty problems

Historically, if newly-found lands were res nullius (ie belonging to no one), then a discoverer could claim them in the name of their sovereign. Discovery alone, however, produced only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
back-to-top-scroll